Thursday, January 5, 2017

How a foreigner pretending to be an experienced filmmaker almost conned university KSh20 M



-A fake filmmaker has been busted trying to con one of the largest private University in Kenya over Ksh 20 million

-The man had lied to his target that he is one of the most sought movie producers in the US with the aim of defrauding one of the most successful businessman and educationist in Kenya

A US based foreigner who came to Kenya a while ago thinking that he could con Kenyan’s millions of shillings has found his dose of medicine.

How a foreigner pretending to be an experienced filmmaker almost conned university KSh20 M

This is after he was busted and taken to court after he tried to defraud Mount Kenya University KSh 20 million.

The man who claimed to own a film production firm in the US identified as XL Squad Entertainment had approached Kenya’s largest university in student population with a proposal to enter into a pact that would see the production of a movie titled The Last Result.

How a foreigner pretending to be an experienced filmmaker almost conned university KSh20 M

His conviction, sources say, undoubtedly inspired MKU to listen to his pitch but in the process discovered that some things were not adding up.

The Thika-based University decided to send a team of experts to the US to do a background check about both the company and the individual concerned.

What followed was a shocking revelation that XL Squad Entertainment never existed and had no capacity to undertake any serious production.

Sensing danger and imminent public embarrassment, XL Squad Entertainment moved to a US court and filed a suit alleging being shortchanged

How a foreigner pretending to be an experienced filmmaker almost conned university KSh20 M

But United States district judge Thomas Thrash Jr dismissed the suit filed by the XL Squad Entertainment. The man had been cornered.

“In this case, the parties seem to have anticipated some sort of final agreement that would be signed between them. They also provided for either party to unilaterally withdraw from the deal ‘at any time’ and ‘for any or no reason’.” The Judge said.

 “The presence of these clauses seems to indicate that the parties did not mean to be bound by the terms of the proposed deal beyond their good faith efforts to negotiate. Rather, the letter of intent simply stood as an outline for a future final agreement,” Justice Thrash Jr explained

 

No comments:

Post a Comment